1948 Citroen 2CV vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 1975 Volvo 66 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Volvo 66 (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1948 Citroen 2CV. (9 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1948 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Volvo 66 weights approximately 138 kg more than 1948 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Citroen 2CV | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | 2CV | 66 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 9 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 682 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1390 mm |
