1948 Citroen 2CV vs. 1977 Volvo 66
To start off, 1977 Volvo 66 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1948 Citroen 2CV. (9 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1948 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1977 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Volvo 66 (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Citroen 2CV. (23 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1977 Volvo 66 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Citroen 2CV | 1977 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | 66 |
Year Released | 1948 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 9 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 23 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 62 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.2:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1550 mm |