1948 Fiat 1100 vs. 1965 Jaguar Type S

To start off, 1965 Jaguar Type S is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Fiat 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Fiat 1100 would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jaguar Type S (208 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1948 Fiat 1100. (50 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jaguar Type S should accelerate faster than 1948 Fiat 1100.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1948 Fiat 1100 1965 Jaguar Type S
Make Fiat Jaguar
Model 1100 Type S
Year Released 1948 1965
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1089 cc 3440 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 50 HP 208 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5550 RPM
Engine Bore Size 68 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74.9 mm 106 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 7.5:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4200 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2740 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]