1948 Fiat 1100 vs. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am
To start off, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Fiat 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Fiat 1100 would be higher. At 3,349 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Pontiac Grand Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am (175 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1948 Fiat 1100. (50 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am should accelerate faster than 1948 Fiat 1100.
Because 1948 Fiat 1100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Fiat 1100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Fiat 1100 | 2002 Pontiac Grand Am | |
| Make | Fiat | Pontiac |
| Model | 1100 | Grand Am |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1089 cc | 3349 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 50 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2730 mm |
