1948 Fiat 1100 vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Fiat 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Fiat 1100 would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (73 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1948 Fiat 1100. (50 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1948 Fiat 1100.
Because 1948 Fiat 1100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Fiat 1100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Fiat 1100 | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | 1100 | Clio |
Year Released | 1948 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1089 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Top Speed | 151 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |