1948 Fiat 1100 vs. 2003 Ford Ka
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Fiat 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Fiat 1100 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1948 Fiat 1100. (50 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1948 Fiat 1100.
Because 1948 Fiat 1100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Fiat 1100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Fiat 1100 | 2003 Ford Ka | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 1100 | Ka |
Year Released | 1948 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1089 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 151 km/hour | 167 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2450 mm |