1948 Fiat 1100 vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Fiat 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Fiat 1100 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1948 Fiat 1100. (50 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1948 Fiat 1100.
Because 1948 Fiat 1100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Fiat 1100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Fiat 1100 | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | 1100 | Clio |
Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1089 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Top Speed | 151 km/hour | 186 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2580 mm |