1948 Ford Prefect vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Ford Prefect. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Ford Prefect would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1948 Ford Prefect. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1948 Ford Prefect.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Ford Prefect. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Ford Prefect. (63 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Ford Prefect.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Ford Prefect | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Prefect | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 63 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 63.5 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.5 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.2:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 3010 mm |