1948 GAZ M-20 vs. 2002 MG TF
To start off, 2002 MG TF is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MG TF (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1948 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1948 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 340 kg more than 2002 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MG TF (165 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2002 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1948 GAZ M-20 | 2002 MG TF | |
Make | GAZ | MG |
Model | M-20 | TF |
Year Released | 1948 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2380 mm |