1948 Holden FX vs. 1999 MCC Smart

To start off, 1999 MCC Smart is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Holden FX (51 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1999 MCC Smart. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1999 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Holden FX weights approximately 250 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1948 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 MCC Smart. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1948 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 MCC Smart. 1999 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1948 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1948 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: