1948 Holden FX vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1948 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1948 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 580 kg more than 1948 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications: