1948 Humber Hawk vs. 2005 Mazda 3
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 1,944 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 3 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1948 Humber Hawk. (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1948 Humber Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Hawk weights approximately 7 kg more than 2005 Mazda 3.
Because 1948 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Humber Hawk | 2005 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Humber | Mazda |
| Model | Hawk | 3 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1944 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 110 mm | 88.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.4:1 | 18.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1247 kg | 1240 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |
