1948 Humber Hawk vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 1,944 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1948 Humber Hawk. (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1948 Humber Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Hawk weights approximately 217 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.
Because 1948 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Humber Hawk | 2006 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Humber | Renault |
| Model | Hawk | Clio |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1944 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1247 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |
