1948 Humber Pullman vs. 1960 Mini MK I
To start off, 1960 Mini MK I is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Humber Pullman (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1960 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Humber Pullman should accelerate faster than 1960 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Pullman weights approximately 1485 kg more than 1960 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Humber Pullman | 1960 Mini MK I | |
Make | Humber | Mini |
Model | Pullman | MK I |
Year Released | 1948 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4086 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5350 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2040 mm |