1948 Humber Pullman vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 1964 Volvo 120 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Humber Pullman (100 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Humber Pullman should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Pullman weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1964 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Humber Pullman | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Humber | Volvo |
| Model | Pullman | 120 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4086 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5350 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2610 mm |
