1948 Humber Pullman vs. 2000 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2000 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Wrangler (123 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1948 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1948 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Pullman weights approximately 705 kg more than 2000 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2000 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Humber Pullman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Humber Pullman | 2000 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Humber | Jeep |
Model | Pullman | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1948 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4086 cc | 2464 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 98.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 120 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5350 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2380 mm |