1948 Humber Pullman vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1948 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1948 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Pullman weights approximately 201 kg more than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Humber Pullman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Humber Pullman | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Humber | Jeep |
Model | Pullman | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1948 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4086 cc | 3965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 120 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.3:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1899 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5350 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2700 mm |