1948 Humber Pullman vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1948 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1948 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Pullman weights approximately 915 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 1948 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Humber Pullman | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Humber | Mazda |
| Model | Pullman | 3 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4086 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 120 mm | 83.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5350 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2650 mm |
