1948 Humber Pullman vs. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando (128 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1948 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1948 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Pullman weights approximately 435 kg more than 2012 Chevrolet Orlando.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Humber Pullman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Humber Pullman | 2012 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Humber | Chevrolet |
Model | Pullman | Orlando |
Year Released | 1948 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4086 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 120 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.3:1 | 16.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5350 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1836 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2760 mm |