1948 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1951 Singer SM 1500
To start off, 1951 Singer SM 1500 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Humber Super Snipe (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (47 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 1951 Singer SM 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 906 kg more than 1951 Singer SM 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Humber Super Snipe | 1951 Singer SM 1500 | |
Make | Humber | Singer |
Model | Super Snipe | SM 1500 |
Year Released | 1948 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4086 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 120 mm | 89.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2320 mm |