1948 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1962 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 1962 Isuzu Minx is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Humber Super Snipe (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 1962 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 716 kg more than 1962 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Humber Super Snipe | 1962 Isuzu Minx | |
| Make | Humber | Isuzu |
| Model | Super Snipe | Minx |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4086 cc | 1491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 120 mm | 75 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2440 mm |
