1948 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Humber Super Snipe (100 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 1002 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Humber Super Snipe | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Humber | MCC |
| Model | Super Snipe | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 4086 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 70 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 1810 mm |
