1948 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2006 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2006 Smart Roadster is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 100 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 781 kg more than 2006 Smart Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Humber Super Snipe | 2006 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Humber | Smart |
Model | Super Snipe | Roadster |
Year Released | 1948 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4086 cc | 696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 120 mm | 67 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 35 L |