1948 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1948 Humber Super Snipe. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1948 Humber Super Snipe.
Because 1948 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Humber Super Snipe | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Humber | Ford |
Model | Super Snipe | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1948 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4086 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2490 mm |