1948 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1948 Humber Super Snipe. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1948 Humber Super Snipe.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Humber Super Snipe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Humber Super Snipe | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Humber | Mazda |
| Model | Super Snipe | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4086 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 96.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 120 mm | 102 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 3010 mm |
