1948 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Humber Super Snipe (100 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1948 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Humber Super Snipe | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Humber | Nissan |
| Model | Super Snipe | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4086 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 68 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2360 mm |
