1948 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1948 Humber Super Snipe. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1948 Humber Super Snipe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 111 kg more than 2010 Cadillac BLS.
Because 1948 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Humber Super Snipe | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Humber | Cadillac |
| Model | Super Snipe | BLS |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4086 cc | 1910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 58 L |
