1948 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Toronado
To start off, 1982 Oldsmobile Toronado is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 5,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Toronado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Jaguar Mark IV weights approximately 55 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Toronado.
Because 1948 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Toronado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Oldsmobile Toronado has automatic transmission and 1948 Jaguar Mark IV has manual transmission. 1948 Jaguar Mark IV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Oldsmobile Toronado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Jaguar Mark IV | 1982 Oldsmobile Toronado | |
| Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Mark IV | Toronado |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 5734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1695 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2900 mm |
