1948 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2010 Mazda 5
To start off, 2010 Mazda 5 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 5 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1948 Jaguar Mark IV.
Because 1948 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda 5 has automatic transmission and 1948 Jaguar Mark IV has manual transmission. 1948 Jaguar Mark IV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Jaguar Mark IV | 2010 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | Mark IV | 5 |
Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1776 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 157 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4585 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2751 mm |