1948 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 3,485 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Jaguar Mark IV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Jaguar Mark IV (123 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Jaguar Mark IV should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1948 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Jaguar Mark IV | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
| Model | Mark IV | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3485 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2360 mm |
