1948 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 2,663 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Jaguar Mark IV is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 4 kg more than 1948 Jaguar Mark IV.
Because 1948 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Jaguar Mark IV | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | Mark IV | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1948 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2663 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1754 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2085 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2649 mm |