1948 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 554 kg more than 1948 Jaguar Mark IV.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Jaguar Mark IV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1948 Jaguar Mark IV has manual transmission. 1948 Jaguar Mark IV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Jaguar Mark IV | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
| Model | Mark IV | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 376 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 2304 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5329 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 3220 mm |
