1948 Jaguar XK vs. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer
To start off, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 605 kg more than 1948 Jaguar XK.
Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Jaguar XK | 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
| Model | XK | Grand Wagoneer |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3442 cc | 5898 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2800 mm |
