1948 Jeep CJ2A vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1948 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1948 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 10 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Because 1948 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Jeep CJ2A | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | CJ2A | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2614 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2350 mm |
