1948 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1969 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1969 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mitsubishi Colt (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 200 kg more than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1948 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1948 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1948 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Jeep CJ3A | 1969 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | CJ3A | Colt |
Year Released | 1948 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2360 mm |