1948 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1998 Lotus Emme
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 201 more horse power than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 432 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Because 1948 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Lotus Emme. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Emme (354 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus Emme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Jeep CJ3A | 1998 Lotus Emme | |
| Make | Jeep | Lotus |
| Model | CJ3A | Emme |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2174 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 260 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 678 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2770 mm |
