1948 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1998 Mazda 323
To start off, 1998 Mazda 323 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda 323 (88 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 35 kg more than 1998 Mazda 323.
Because 1948 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1948 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda 323. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1948 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Jeep CJ3A | 1998 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ3A | 323 |
Year Released | 1948 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2620 mm |