1948 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2002 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2002 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 784 more horse power than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 24 kg more than 2002 Lotec C 1000.
Because 1948 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Lotec C 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 845 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Jeep CJ3A | 2002 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Jeep | Lotec |
Model | CJ3A | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1948 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1150 mm |