1948 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1948 Jeep CJ3A.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Jeep CJ3A | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Jeep | Jeep |
| Model | CJ3A | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2630 mm |
