1948 Maserati A6G vs. 2012 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2012 Nissan Juke is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Juke is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Juke (188 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1948 Maserati A6G. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1948 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Juke weights approximately 467 kg more than 1948 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Juke, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Maserati A6G | 2012 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Maserati | Nissan |
Model | A6G | Juke |
Year Released | 1948 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1342 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2530 mm |