1948 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Maserati A6GCS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Maserati A6GCS (129 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Maserati A6GCS should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 355 kg more than 1948 Maserati A6GCS.
Because 1948 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1948 Maserati A6GCS has manual transmission. 1948 Maserati A6GCS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Maserati A6GCS | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Maserati | MCC |
Model | A6GCS | Smart |
Year Released | 1948 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1978 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 106 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 975 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2510 mm |