1948 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 690 kg more than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Maserati A6GCS | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Maserati | Mazda |
| Model | A6GCS | 3 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1310 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2650 mm |
