1948 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1948 Maserati A6GCS.
Because 1948 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Maserati A6GCS | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Maserati | Holden |
Model | A6GCS | Epica |
Year Released | 1948 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1978 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2700 mm |