1948 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Compass (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Compass weights approximately 853 kg more than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Maserati A6GCS | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Maserati | Jeep |
| Model | A6GCS | Compass |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1473 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2634 mm |
