1948 Renault Juva vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,784 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1948 Renault Juva. (24 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1948 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 560 kg more than 1948 Renault Juva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Renault Juva | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Juva | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1003 cc | 1784 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2610 mm |
