1948 Riley RM A vs. 2010 Alfa Romeo MiTo
To start off, 2010 Alfa Romeo MiTo is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,494 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Riley RM A weights approximately 80 kg more than 2010 Alfa Romeo MiTo.
Because 1948 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Alfa Romeo MiTo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Riley RM A | 2010 Alfa Romeo MiTo | |
Make | Riley | Alfa Romeo |
Model | RM A | MiTo |
Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1494 cc | 1366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2520 mm |