1948 Riley RM A vs. 2010 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2010 Nissan Cube is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Cube weights approximately 36 kg more than 1948 Riley RM A.
Because 1948 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Riley RM A | 2010 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Riley | Nissan |
Model | RM A | Cube |
Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1494 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1271 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2530 mm |