1948 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Mazda 2
To start off, 2013 Mazda 2 is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Riley RM A weights approximately 192 kg more than 2013 Mazda 2.
Because 1948 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Riley RM A | 2013 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Riley | Mazda |
| Model | RM A | 2 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1494 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1694 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1476 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2489 mm |
