1948 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Riley RM A would be higher. At 6,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 495 kg more than 1948 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Riley RM A | 2013 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | Riley | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | RM A | C |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1494 cc | 6300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 445 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4707 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2008 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1433 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2760 mm |
