1948 Simca 5 vs. 1970 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1970 ZAZ 966 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Simca 5 would be higher. At 887 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 ZAZ 966 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 ZAZ 966 (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1948 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 ZAZ 966 should accelerate faster than 1948 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 ZAZ 966 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1948 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Simca 5 | 1970 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Simca | ZAZ |
| Model | 5 | 966 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 570 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 14 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3220 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1280 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2170 mm |
